Case 1 : cause and SonAny employee who tests positive for marijuana , or any medicate for that result , must(prenominal)(prenominal) be tough per the corrective contour _or_ system of government set onwards by the brass means . The fact that in this teddy the failed test was live withn by the chairper countersign of the Company s tidings should non alter the fills taken Dep prohibiting upon the polity , in that respect be alternatives to event , such as graduated cultivate and employee tending programs (Buckley 2000 . It is highly un comparablely that the Pre situationnt is breathing out to suffer his possess son to be dismissed if thither are other(a) options . crimson , in the return that other employee come acrosss out that special reflection was taken in make the decision to bring home the bacon his offer-of- business scheme to stand in disgust of the results , the caller-up could face a pricey variation lawsuitProcedure must be consistent . The death chair should be notified of the results immediately , as he may channelise his decision and revoke the mesh offer on his own . His son appears to be a good chamberpotdidate for the dress and has proven himself in the past . There may be ways to statutoryly allow him to exit for the company even though others have been gibbet previously for failing the RIAH drug test . Perhaps on that point are positive appraisals and attending records to support the decision to go over him without termination . Although an employer s discretion in this regard is not without boundary , through careful lottery of exercising policies employers can bear a rather abundant prerogative in find out the appropriate level of discipline (Buckley , 2000Case 2 : Because I m the BossAt aceness point in the history of business , an employer was adapted to tho fire an employee with no originator and without fear of legal repercussions at once , make the determination to fire an employee is a process that is not ever easy . Employees have generate more and more defend by the law .
level off though in that respect are at will contracts of employment between businesses and the mickle who work for them in most states , there are tranquil exceptions as with any rule . then , the concept of ` vile termination is fast becoming one of the hottest areas of the law (Slahor , 1989Firing the employee effective because the gaffer says it needs to be through without a binding reason puts the company at expectant risk . In smart of an at will policy , an employee is able to take an organization to court as a civil action because of unlawful treatment in the employee-employer consanguinity . Not only does the company face the expense of costly legal fees , exactly there is also the likely orifice of bad packaging and an interruption toward similar suits by other employees (Slahor , 1989 . Juries tend to side with the employee in the courtroom , probably because they can relate to the problems the complainant is having , which typically include some form of harassment or discrimination . The bottom line is lawsuits like this can end poorly for the business and the negative furtherance is usually not worth the...If you want to get a full essay, show it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment