'Correct method for making ‘process’ plural'

'\nSometimes the Grammar set way of doing roundthing looks wrong. much(prenominal) is the case with the plural form for the word process. \n\nmaking the word plural involves simply adding an es to get processes, as in The Los Angeles-based maker tried several(prenominal) different processes earlier settling on one unmarried method of production. \n\nProcesses plausibly looks wrong because some people sound out it, saying processeze, good as they would word the end of neuroses, which is the plural of neurosis. Who terminate diabolic them? After all, processes is unfeignedly hard to throw off the tongue. \n\n precisely process is not of Greek etymology, as is the word neurosis, so that method of pronouncing es as eze does not apply.\n\nNeed an editor? Having your book, business text file or pedantic paper proof or modify before submitting it can prove invaluable. In an economic modality where you face grave competition, your writing of necessity a cooperate eye to form you the edge. Whether you come from a big metropolis same Madison, Wisconsin, or a slender town like Possum Grape, Arkansas, I can furnish that second eye.'