“London 1802” vs “Douglass” Essay Essay

Throughout the centuries, in that location have been an infinite amount of literary works written by a sea of authors that write a variety of genres. All of these works argon strange in their feature way, and even if their theme is similar to that of another, the author always ads a bit of his/her own flare in order to light up said literary creation unique in many way. William Wordsworths London 1802 and Paul Laurence Dunbars Douglass, although quite similar in form and metre structure, do add their own flare through the use of specific details. Through the use of these devices, the speaker units show their revolt for the evil deeds humans do and attempt to change them. Form is a very primary(prenominal) aspect of belles-lettres. Both London 1802 and Douglass are sonnets therefore hinting that the work will be very often a serious topic, which as the endorser continues, is proven to be true. The rhyme scheme used in the first two quatrains is similar in two sonnets.The digest quatrain and couplet, however, are different in rhyme. In Douglass, the first quatrain is used to tell this person of the evil that is occurring in that time, and how even his wildest nightmares could never measure up to that is now being done whereas in the first quatrain written in London 1802 is used to see the place and what it is like at the time. In the second quatrain, the speaker takes as if he truly believes that the presence of this man to whom he writes could change the evil that is occurring. Douglass on the other hand, describes what the situation he is in is like. Although apiece speaker advancees this in a different manner, the ultimate goal of both is to shed light on the wrong doing of humans. Another device used by both speakers both similarly and differently is sentence structure. On both, the last six lines compose one sentence. This sentence in Douglass is used to ask for focussing and comfort from Fredrick Douglass however, this happens in the se cond sentence in the sonnet London, 1802. Dunbars purpose for making the last sentence about Douglass ability to guide the shivering bark ( Dunbar line 12) is to give the reader a sense of repulsion, like his own repulsion and therefore encouraging the reader tochange.The last sentence in Wordsworths poem, on the other hand, is used to praise John Milton. This leaves the reader with the impression that Milton was in incident a great man, and that we should strive in order to extend more like the person. Even though they are written in different sentences, the fact that this is even mentioned at all suggests that man variety show has become repulsive and although they are expressed in different manners, it is clear that the eventual goal of these speakers is to make the readers change. There are specific details used throughout both sonnets that, again, help to reveal the speakers ultimate purpose. First, the way the speakers begin both poems is completely different. Wordsworth co mmences in a tone of need and forcefulness by saying Milton thou shouldst be living at this hour (Wordsworth line 1).This makes the reader excited about reading the rest of the poem and in like manner, adds interest to the work. Dunbar, however, takes a more meditative approach by saying Ah, Douglass, we have falln on evil days. (Dunbar line 1). This, although not as exciting as the previous example, is similarly effective in grabbing attention because it leaves the reader wondering what it is that could be inspiring such deep thought while still, clearly stating his position. The speaker in this poem also says Give us comfort through the lonely dark (line 14). This line makes the reader believe that there is still hope in humanity. All we need is comforting from the wicked world and we can become better people. We have the qualities that make for decent citizens, we just no longer show them. Wordsworth, however, shows no beneficence nor hope for humanity.He reconciles Oh Raise us up, return to us again and give us manners, virtue, freedom, source (Wordsworth line 8). This suggests that Wordsworth has lost all hope in humanity and believes that the qualities that make for decent people are lost. People need someone to show them the qualities that make for good people, they need to be shown. Although both speakers believe that humanity is cruel and abominable, the way they perceive the solution is obviously much different.With the devices used throughout both poems, it is apparent that society needs to change in order to become better. The way things are is utterly horrendous and by no means is it suitable for living in. Although both poems express similar ideals, the state of mind of the speaker is clearly much different, and the way to go about fixing society is also much different. Because the devices and tone used throughout both poems wasdifferent, it in turn made their works of literature truly a one-of-a-kind.