Relationship Between Strategy and Structure Essay

Relationship Between Strategy and Structure - examine Exampleof Excellence to better serve their mission of Strengthen Americas Force of fateful Action and provides the Nation an adaptable Army for an uncertain future. These centers provide specialized training in certain argonas of expertise that convey current war fighting requirements. TADOC is organized in a stratified fashion, with different factions dealing with their specified functions and goals and reporting directly to one higher up and the firm agreement is headed by a Commanding General. The organization organize distributes resources and roles along strictly defined lines and the higher representation have the final say in formal policy determination, conflict resolution and reward and recognition. This is reflective of a geomorphologic framework apostrophize to management with clear goals and information available for the organization outline. The shape up is a successful fit for an organization which has to train future soldiers for stressful and turbulent conditions though adaptability and degraded thinking are traits which are to be induced in their students the organization is vanquish served through uncompromising rules, policy and training regimes. With the most advance technology and data available to them for analysis and decision making, the structural framework lets the managers or leaders of the organization form future strategies which are to be followed by the whole work force. The strict management leads to an environment where commands are readyly followed and security and precautions related to their activity are highly emphasized. The centralized control is possible through the hierarchical structure which helps in implementing the increase plans in the different sectors (human resource and technological) of TARDOC. While it culture and practices of the... The researcher states that strong leader ship is an essential cut off of any organizations success today. A s tructural framework point of view allows managers to set a strategy which can be utilized in environments of low uncertainty and be of the greatest fit with the structure or the external factors in which the organization has to work. The leader clearly defines roles, authority and responsibility along the lines of organisational goals and the focus is on facts, task and logic not on emotional aspects. The approach works best when cause and effect analysis are clearly understood with regards to the impact of the external environment and the organizations interior structure. Traditionally, it has been defined that a companys strategic options are bounded by the environment. The approach is a successful fit for an organization which has to train future soldiers for stressful and turbulent conditions though adaptability and quick thinking are traits which are to be induced in their students the organization is best served through potent rules, policy and training regimes. The centrali zed control is possible through the hierarchical structure which helps in implementing the development plans in the different sectors. The paper written by Thompson, 1991, discusses the organization Department of defense at pentagon with the kindred research analysis as was attempted in this essay. It is concluded that a proper restructuring of the department as consistent with their strategy could eradicate these problems.