Nationalism After the War of 1812 Essay

After the state of war of 1812, a surge of patriotism spread e very(prenominal)where throughout America. Having unofficially won the war without heretofore an official army, the people of America became very proud of themselves and how their bully body politic established such a feat. The nationalism grew until John marshall, an aggressive antique Justice, further reinforced and expanded it. He was a devout Federalist constitute by John Adams years before his most famous representative of Marbury vs. capital of Wisconsin in 1803. Being a Federalist he was a great rival to Thomas Jefferson. He served until 1835 and was the forth Supreme judicature Justice.His only when legal schooling was six weeks attending lectures at the College of William and Mary, however when he took the bench in 1801, he changed the Judicial Branch as we turn in it. In fact, he made the branch the most powerful arm of the government at that time.Read more than How do checks and balances guard again st despotism essayHis most significant early case was the famous Marbury v. Madison in 1803, which established the right of the court to declare the actions of local, state or federal governments invalid if they violate the Constitution. This process of declaring actions void was called Judicial limited limited review and it made the lawcourt equally as powerful as the legislative and executive branches of government.Another important case was Martin vs. Hunters Lessee in 1816. The ruling by Marshall declared that the power of the Supreme act extended to the State Courts. The court now had the right to directly review other courts decisions. Yet another case, Cohens vs. Virginia strengthened this right and extended the deform of the court all the way to the citizens of the U.S. and states. Marshalls court became more and more powerful until it got the right to review almost all demoralize court decisions.The famous Fletcher vs. Peck case ruled (in 1810) that the Supreme Court had the right to void State laws. The details behind the case were as follows The Georgia legislature had issued extensive land grants in a get out with the Yazoo Land Company. It seemed suspicious so the company was taken to court. A succeeding legislative session repealed the grants because of the corruption that had accompanied the original grant. The Supreme Court, with Marshall presiding, decided that the original action by the Georgia Assembly had represent a valid contract, which could not be broken regardless of the corruption. This was the very first time that a State law was voided because it went against the Constitution.Then, after the war of 1812 Marshall issued more decisions that strengthened the federal government and Federalist ideas. In the McCulloch vs. free state case, Marshall ruled that the state did not have the right to tax or regulate banks. This alike encouraged economic expansion and development. In the Dartmouth vs. Woodward case it was declare d that the states had no right to alter or frustrate contracts unilaterally. It also promoted business development.The last important case was Gibbons vs. Ogden, which further strengthened federal power by ruling that the Constitution had specifically minded(p) Congress the power to regulate commerce.Under John Marshall, the Supreme Court gained enough power to surpass the power of the other branches of the government. He also declared many laws and rulings that America still follows and lives under even today. either way, he changed the Judicial branch forever, especially at that time and the humans has never seen a more intelligent man presiding.