Psychology Exercise Essay

A research doubt was proposed to a student asking why teenagers have much barrier focusing their attention early in the morning when compared to that of young children. later on carefully considering the recount in each choice option, the following were bedded in order the most convincing to the least convincing 1. thirty well-designed studies published in esteemed diarys have discovered that melatonin a ductless gland involved in sleep is secreted by the body of teenagers at a different point in the sleep-wake cycle than it is for young children and adults. 2.A living expert, appearing on Good Morning America, stated that she believes teenagers have much hindrance focusing their attention than younger children because, as she learned in her interviews with students of all ages, the teenagers were more likely to skip breakfast. 3. After overhearing many teenagers talking about why they struggle with paying attention early in the morning, it provided a good understanding for the problem. 4. Twenty well-controlled experiments published in honored journals strongly suggest a cause for why teenagers have more difficulty focusing their attention early in the morning than do younger children.5. Two well-controlled experiments published in a prestigious journal suggest a cause for why teenagers have more difficulty focusing their attention early in the morning than do younger children. 6. After a recent airing of a story on the news show Dateline on NBC about some mass being morning people and others being night people, Channel 5 asked viewers to call in the reasons they have difficulty focusing attention in the morning. Two reasons were given most frequently, and those reasons were presented on that nights local news.7. A relative has a hunch. The decision to give the aforementioned(prenominal) reasons the rank in which they received was based fully on the evidence presented in each statement. Items 1-3 indicated a true correlation between the propose d suspense and the stated reason and personal understanding. Items 4 and 5 could have been likely sources, but they were absent the findings in the statement offered. Item 6 was non a source focused on the study of teenagers, but alternatively its research was done on aPSYCHOLOGY 3 large-minded level. Finally, item 7 did non come from someone with credibility nor did it deliver any scientific verification to back up any reasoning. Also, it did not contain a valid reason pertaining to the question at hand. thither were only two reasons suggested that contained factual evidence that were believable and credible (Shohov, 2004).Items 1 and 2 proposed that research in relation to the proposed question had been carefully and scientifically performed. Item 1 declared that thirty well-designed studies had been performed concluding that a specific hormone was believed to be the cause for a teenagers unfitness to focus early in the morning. These studies had also been published in pre stigious journals. Item 2 aired on a publically value early morning news broadcast. The finder-of-fact was an expert nutritionist who had conducted many interviews on children of all ages.Her conclusions were drawn based on answers voluntarily given by the interviewed teenagers. Her findings concluded that teenagers skipping breakfast had more difficulty focusing early in the morning. Both of these suggested reasons offered a definitive answer to the proposed question, and they bore evidence to congest their findings (Shohov, 2004). References Shohov, S. (2004). Advances in psychology research, volume 17. Hauppauge, NY Nova Science Publishers, Inc.